Shapira v. Christiana Care v. Houghton

CONCLUDED

Oral Argument
06/04/14 – 06/04/14

Play button overlay 45f08f27c7337d189e8c31e635b5d0a0781b273131135cd77ee8b6f12366e7a2
Play button overlay 45f08f27c7337d189e8c31e635b5d0a0781b273131135cd77ee8b6f12366e7a2

Summary

In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, Christiana Care Health Services, Inc. contended that the lower court's ruling in the medical malpractice case constitutes reversible error requiring a new trial. This is a case that arises out of a surgical procedure performed by defendant Nadiv Shapira, M.D. As a result of that procedure, John Houghton sustained injuries and incurred medical expenses of approximately $335,000. His wife, Evelyn, brought a claim for loss of consortium against Dr. Shapira, Nadiv Shapira, M.D., LLC, and CCHS. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Mr. Houghton in the amount of $3,750,000 and in favor of his wife in the amount of $650,000. The verdict apportioned liability 65% to Dr. Shapira and 35% to CCHS.

Outcome

The judgment of the Superior Court was affirmed and the case was
remanded with instructions to the Superior Court to vacate the supplemental verdict. Jurisdiction was not retained

Sessions

Suggest a Trial

Want to see a trial that you don't see in our list of upcoming trials?

Suggest a Case

CVN Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

CVN Essentials

Video Library

Unlimited access to thousands of hours of past coverage of high stakes civil litigation

Video Library

  • Follow Us
  • Contact Us
  • 3901 Roswell Road
  • Suite 302
  • Marietta, GA 30062
  • 877-838-9067

Copyright 2019 Courtroom Connect.