Sorci v. Ford Motor Company

VERDICT

Trial
09/29/09 – 10/15/09

Play button overlay 45f08f27c7337d189e8c31e635b5d0a0781b273131135cd77ee8b6f12366e7a2
Play button overlay 45f08f27c7337d189e8c31e635b5d0a0781b273131135cd77ee8b6f12366e7a2

Summary

Products liability challenge to allegedly defective automobile seats.

According to the plaintiff, a pickup truck rear-ended the plaintiff's Ford Probe while trying to pass at 3:30 am on a dry road. The Probe left the road, hit a rock, and overturned.

The plaintiff suffered a burst compression fracture at T-12, and was paralyzed for life, even though the plaintiff was wearing a seat belt, the airbag deployed, and both vehicles were traveling at moderate speeds (30-40 miles per hour), and the collision forces were equivalent to 8 mph (rear-impact vehicle collision) and 20 mph (front-impact rock collision).

The plaintiff contended that the severe nature of the injury was due to unsafe seats in the Ford Probe. The seat allegedly was reclined at a normal 24 degrees before the collision, then deformed to 54 degrees during the event (dynamic deflection), and was reclined to 34-38 degrees after the accident (permanent deflection).

According to the plaintiff, the increased seat declination resulting from the first collision positioned the plaintiff's spine vulnerably so that it could not withstand the force from the second collision.

Defendants Ford and Mazda contended that the sole cause of the accident was the pickup driver's recklessness, and that the Probe driver's seat was properly designed and performed as intended, deflecting from 24 degrees to a maximum of 44 degrees before ending up at 34 degrees at the time of the second collision. According to the defendant, the seat's initial declination properly absorbed energy from the initial rear-end collision, and the angle of the seat back had nothing to do with the plaintiff's injury, which resulted from the subsequent collision with the rock.

By a 7-1 vote the jurors determined that the seat in the Ford Probe was not defective.

Outcome

The jury determined that the seat was not defective.

Sessions

OCT
1
OCT
15

Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

Suggest a Trial

Want to see a trial that you don't see in our list of upcoming trials?

Suggest a Case

CVN Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

CVN Essentials

Video Library

Unlimited access to thousands of hours of past coverage of high stakes civil litigation

Video Library

  • Follow Us
  • Contact Us
  • 3901 Roswell Road
  • Suite 302
  • Marietta, GA 30062
  • 877-838-9067

Copyright 2020 Courtroom Connect.