Lozano v. Paris Hotel And Casino

Summary

In this slip-and-fall, premises liability case, plaintiff casino patron contends defendant casino is responsible for the back injuries he suffered when he fell on the property's wet marble floor.

The defense contends insufficient evidence exists to prove what plaintiff actually slipped on and claim that the liquid on the floor could have come from liquids that plaintiff himself spilled at the time.

Outcome

For the plaintiff: $3,445,000.
Apportionment of fault:
Plaintiff: 50%
Defendant: 50%

Blog Posts

Casino Hit With $3.4M+ Slip-and-Fall Verdict: Watch Full Trial via CVN
Apr 16, 2026