Cooke v. State

CONCLUDED

Oral Argument
05/07/14 – 05/07/14

Play button overlay 45f08f27c7337d189e8c31e635b5d0a0781b273131135cd77ee8b6f12366e7a2
Play button overlay 45f08f27c7337d189e8c31e635b5d0a0781b273131135cd77ee8b6f12366e7a2

Summary

In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, the attorney representing defendant James E. Cooke contended that the trial court abused its discretion when it failed to grant a mistrial when it was discovered, after the verdict, that a juror had failed to properly answer voir dire. On June 16, 2005, Mr. Cooke was arrested and charged for the murder of Lindsey Bonistall, and the burglaries of Amalia Cuadra and Cheryl Harmon's apartments. On August 9, 2005, Mr. Cooke was indicted for murder first degree,
felony murder first degree, rape first degree and numerous other felony offenses. A penalty hearing began April 18, 2012 and ended May 3, 2012. The jury recommended death as to murder first degree (intentional) and recommended death as to murder first degree (felony). Mr. Cooke filed a motion for a new trial which was denied on July 24, 2012. On September 17, 2012, Mr. Cooke was sentenced to death.

Outcome

The judgment of the Superior Court was affirmed.

Sessions

Suggest a Trial

Want to see a trial that you don't see in our list of upcoming trials?

Suggest a Case

CVN Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

CVN Essentials

Video Library

Unlimited access to thousands of hours of past coverage of high stakes civil litigation

Video Library

  • Follow Us
  • Contact Us
  • 3901 Roswell Road
  • Suite 302
  • Marietta, GA 30062
  • 877-838-9067

Copyright 2019 Courtroom Connect.