Bhole, Inc. v. Shore Investments

CONCLUDED

Oral Argument
03/13/13 – 03/13/13

Play button overlay 45f08f27c7337d189e8c31e635b5d0a0781b273131135cd77ee8b6f12366e7a2
Play button overlay 45f08f27c7337d189e8c31e635b5d0a0781b273131135cd77ee8b6f12366e7a2

Summary

In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, the issues on appeal were whether the Trial Judge committed legal error regarding Alexander J. Pires, Jr.'s personal liability for tortious interference with Shore Investments, Inc.'s lease with Bhole, Inc. by relying upon inapposite law and whether Mr. Pires’ actions were protected by the Restatement Section 770 and affiliate privileges. Shore filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court against Mr. Pires, Bhole and other defendants on September 10, 2009, alleging that Bhole breached its lease with Shore, and that the defendants conspired to tortiously interfere with Shore’s lease with Bhole and business expectations. In a Post-Trial Opinion issued November 28, 2011, the Trial Judge found in favor of Shore on the breach of lease claim and on its tortious interference with lease claim.

Outcome

The Superior Court's judgment was affirmed in part and reversed in  part, and the case was  remanded  for  further  proceedings. Jurisdiction was not retained.

Sessions

Suggest a Trial

Want to see a trial that you don't see in our list of upcoming trials?

Suggest a Case

CVN Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

CVN Essentials

Video Library

Unlimited access to thousands of hours of past coverage of high stakes civil litigation

Video Library

  • Follow Us
  • Contact Us
  • 3901 Roswell Road
  • Suite 302
  • Marietta, GA 30062
  • 877-838-9067

Copyright 2019 Courtroom Connect.