Dr. Ian Newmark’s Testimony in Wrongful Death Med Mal Trial Helps Lead to $36M Verdict

Javascript is required to watch this video

If you have enabled JavaScript and still cannot play the video, please contact support.

Testifying in a 2015 Georgia medical malpractice trial, Dr. Ian Newmark, a pulmonologist and critical care specialist from New York, details his belief that the defendants’ treatment fell below the standard of care. 

This trial involved a woman who had a kidney removed. During that operation, the surgeons inadvertently ligated, or tied off, the abdominal aorta, and the complication went unrecognized. Postoperatively, the patient complained of extreme pain, numbness, and paralysis of her lower extremities, but the doctors and nurses seemingly performed inadequate examinations and no investigations into these complaints for two days. By that time, the patient had lost the use of her other kidney as well as her legs. She died after a five-month struggle. 

Newmark addresses the care by the specialists involved in the immediate post-operative period. Speaking with the calm confidence, clarity, and unwavering authority that one would expect of an excellent testifying expert, his many years of experience in critical care are apparent as he hammers home the negligence of two of the physicians involved as well as the nursing staff.  

The expert begins by explaining how the lower extremities should have been examined by any doctor initiating post-operative management. This would include checking the lower extremities for swelling, sensation, and pulses. The defendant, who was a nephrologist, admitted to simply looking at the extremities. The expert concludes that this violated the standard of care for such doctors. The first defendant apparently documented that he had spent 35 minutes in caring for the patient. Further, in deposition he admitted to spending less than five minutes on the leg examination, despite the fact that a nurse had documented that she had informed the doctor of cold, paralyzed, sensationless legs. This warning should have alerted all caretakers to perform a thorough evaluation including a careful look at motor strength, pulses and neurologic findings. Additional testing, the expert maintains, should have been considered or ordered, including urgent consultation with a vascular specialist. Nonetheless, no action was taken that day. 

The second defendant doctor, a critical care specialist that the first had called in on suspicion that the patient was having a pulmonary embolus, fell under Newmark’s criticism as well. This doctor failed to fully examine the patient’s lower extremities. Indeed, most pulmonary emboli originate in the legs, so if that diagnosis is being considered, it is imperative to feel them for abnormalities. Additionally, it appears from documentation that the nurse taking care of the patient had informed the critical care doctor of the problems with the patient’s legs, yet he did not check her neurologic or vascular integrity, and did not call any other specialist. The expert sees this as negligent and outside of the standard of care.

Finally, Newmark looks at the fact that the nursing staff had documented continually normal lower extremity pulses in a patient whose aorta was ligated. He concludes that the normal pulses reported were not possible and that the nursing staff documenting this data had not really done the examination.

Given the patient’s problems with cold, weak, sensationless lower extremities, Dr. Newmark concludes that any internal medicine doctor (and both of the previously mentioned doctors were certified internists) should be aware that something catastrophic had happened either from a neurologic, vascular, or intraoperative technicality, and should know the basic workup for these possibilities. Further appropriate steps include a sonogram or CT scan, as well as evaluation by a vascular specialist, none of which was forthcoming. 

His testimony helped deliver a $36 million verdict for the plaintiff.

--

Gary Gansar, MD, is residency trained and Board Certified in General Surgery. He previously served as Chief of Surgery and Staff at Elmwood Medical Center and on the Medical Executive Committee at Mercy Hospital and Touro Infirmary in New Orleans, LA. Dr. Gansar also served as Clinical Instructor and Professor of Surgery at Tulane University. He received his MD and served as Chief Resident at Tulane University Medical School. Dr. Gansar joined AMFS as a consulting medical expert in 2011 and has served as Medical Director since Nov. 2015. In this capacity, Dr. Gansar provides consultation, review and guidance to attorney clients.

View Similar Clips

More from the Proceeding
Marion v. Little
More from Industry
Health care
More from Practice Area
Malpractice, Negligence

Suggest a Trial

Want to see a trial that you don't see in our list of upcoming trials?

Suggest a Case

CVN Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

CVN Essentials

Video Library

Unlimited access to thousands of hours of past coverage of high stakes civil litigation

Video Library

  • Follow Us
  • Contact Us
  • 4901 Olde Towne Parkway
  • Suite 100
  • Marietta, GA 30068
  • 877-834-8627
  • 404-935-0321

Copyright 2024 Courtroom Connect.